spinner

Rheingold Beer

Rheingold Beer

Rated 2.759 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by F. X. Matt Brewing Company

Utica, NY, United States

Style:  Pale Lager

5% Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



Rheingold changed its recipe from the dry style of the war years to its traditional 1930s style. It’s been know since 2003 as Rheingold Beer.

ID: 11474 Last updated 12 years ago Added to database 19 years ago

Key Stats

5
percentile

0

Drunk

9

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank50626
Overall Percentile5.4
Style Rank882 of 1716
Style Percentile48.6
Lowest Score1.4
Highest Score3.5
Average Score2.678
Weighted Score2.759
Standard Deviation0.670

Rating Distribution

Beer vs Style

9 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
SURFSLEEZ 43 reviews
rated 3.5 19 years ago

Aroma: 0 | Appearance: 0 | Mouthfeel: 0 | Flavor: 0 | Overall: 0

I drank this when I was living in Yorktown for a short while. It beats Bud and Coors; I haven't seen it for a long time until today. Can't tell if this is the same brew or not, however.

  • RICHSBEER 1929 reviews
    rated 2.9 11 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

    Pours a crystal clear yellow color with a fizzy white head, The aroma is grainy malt, corn and light alcohol. A bit fruity for a lagerbier. Does not smell very appetizing. The taste is very light and watery. The body is so light and crisp, it makes it pretty bearable really. The fruitiness is very mild on the flavor but still noticeable. Not bad, I might even buy it again...for things like football games with the guys.

  • JERRYMORRISON 2130 reviews
    rated 2.4 12 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

    Not a bad beer, it just lacks character. Similar to many macro lagers. Hay in the aromas and flavor department. Very unexciting, but i wasnt expecting much so...

  • SUDSMCDUFF 3781 reviews
    rated 2.1 12 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 4

    Just arrived in Houston so when the pool and TheWick called, me and this were there.. . gold yellow, medium foam, not alot of lacing .. . aroma of dying grass + hay .. . . My heinie's asleep.
    Fine. We'll keep our voices down .. . simple, pretty thin, mostly corn, hay flavours but not offensive, bring the price down 3-4 dollars and it might do well enough.. . Oh trust me, it'll work, or my name isn't Kim Fong Toi!

  • RJA 2975 reviews
    rated 2.4 12 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    This beer has a sentimental significance. It was the beer my father drank as I grew up. So in his honor I salute. A bright yellow-sunshine in color. A small creamy textured, creamy white head rises briefly above. It disappears quickly leaving practically no ringlet. A nose of grain and lemongrass. A tasting of sweet grains and grassy hops in a light, crispy carbonated body. It is a good thing my palate has advanced beyond my father’s.

  • FOZAPD 474 reviews
    rated 2.9 18 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 6

    This was a very boring beer. There was nothing too awful about this beer, but at the same time it reminded me of a slightly improved Budweiser(which I never drink anymore). It was a light golden color with a slight hop bite, otherwise mostly ho hum. Had it at a friends wedding on Long Island and wouldn't get it again.

  • LILKEM 380 reviews
    rated 1.4 18 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

    this was pretty freakin awful. color matched that of corona- yellowish gold. i had a hard time getting this one down, it was that bad. maybe i had a bad couple bottles? I could drink Bud before this though. agree with another who said it smelled like heineken and tasted like a skunkier version of miller lite. well put.

  • REIDROVER 725 reviews
    rated 3.1 19 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 6

    Pours a lite golden colour with a massive head ( I had it in a semi-frozen mug). Nice malty smell about it..some fruitiness also , surprisingly good for the cheapest beer I could see. Taste is actually very very good for a macro cheapo lager..sweetness is not too overpowering and i can tatse the malt quite well..mmm pleasant to drink this cold. Average macro feel in the mouth.. Very drinkable beer this cold..nice I actually enjoyed this cheapo..nice bang for the buck

  • EYEDRINKALE 939 reviews
    rated 3.4 19 years ago

    Aroma: 8 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 8 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 7

    I haven’t had this stuff since I was probably 12 years old. Nice looking clear bottle with silkscreened simple label. Pours with a nice white head but it thins out to an 1/8 inch pretty quick. Nice dough aroma which I really like. Taste is thin and light, a bt like corn juice. Mellow hop bite makes this pretty good stuff. No skunk to it. I think I’m actually liking this.

  • SURFSLEEZ 43 reviews
    rated 3.5 19 years ago

    Aroma: 0 | Appearance: 0 | Mouthfeel: 0 | Flavor: 0 | Overall: 0

    I drank this when I was living in Yorktown for a short while. It beats Bud and Coors; I haven't seen it for a long time until today. Can't tell if this is the same brew or not, however.

Discuss This Beer