spinner

Carlton Crown Lager

Carlton Crown Lager

Rated 2.918 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by Carlton & United Breweries (CUB)

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Style:  Lager

4.9% Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



A smooth and rich lager that has been the flagship of CUB since the fifties.

ID: 9049 Last updated 19 years ago Added to database 21 years ago

Key Stats

12
percentile

0

Drunk

14

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank47289
Overall Percentile11.6
Style Rank680 of 1066
Style Percentile36.2
Lowest Score1.5
Highest Score5.0
Average Score2.900
Weighted Score2.918
Standard Deviation0.875

Rating Distribution

Beer vs Style

14 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
  • CHOPZ 7131 reviews
    rated 2.6 13 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    My friend Mart bought a case of 24 of these when I visited him in Doha, Qatar. Pours a golden colour with an off-white head, decent retention and nice film lacing all-around. A thin coating also stays on the brew the whole time. The scent is pilsner-like with some malt. Smooth mouthfeel with a little stickiness at the end. Malty taste with a bit of hop in the finish and grain showing up in the aftertaste. Not a bad Australian lager, but thicker than other lagers I had here. Harder to drink many of these (compared to the Beck's - which I also had many).

  • SIGMUND 6643 reviews
    rated 2.6 15 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    Sample from 330 ml bottle, as Crown Lager, at the Brewery International stand, Smak 09. ABV is 4.9%. Golden colour, low head. Fruity aroma. Fairly fruity and zesty flavour, some estery sidenotes, low bitterness. Not a great beer, but drinkable.

  • PHISHPOND417 3045 reviews
    rated 3.1 16 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 6

    Brought back from Australia from my friend Jess. Thank you! Pours a brightly coloured golden with a large white head. Aroma is light and fruity, taste is relatively light as well, but grainy midpalate. A nice clean beer.

  • OH6GDX 8392 reviews
    rated 1.5 17 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    Golden colour, minor white head. Aroma is hoppy. Flavour is fruits, raisins, hops and slightly malty. Flavour is quite pleasant, but a bit too sweet for my taste.

  • BEERCRONIC 895 reviews
    rated 2.6 17 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    Plain old average straw colour, produced some white head, but I only had a sip in a glass to see the colour. Drank the rest out of the bottle - I had to...it was a cool bottle and begged to be drank out of. Turned out to be a decent slamming beer. Smelt not bad - probally - has to be local swill in Aust., too bad it was on the weak side - some malts and a slight chemical odor. Flavour was pretty weak too, but non-offensive. Bland malt and yeast with a bit of hops. Went down smooth and quick leaving a minor bitter aftertaste that was enjoyable.

  • CAMEL 53 reviews
    rated 3.0 17 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 6

    Only had this one first today, after hearing about how great different people thought it was. But, the 'standard' Coldies are much better. This was no way 'great' as described, although it went down really well, very smooth, its not fantastic. Non imposing aroma and appearance,would struggle to get above 'average' marks.

  • RAINMAN 892 reviews
    rated 3.3 17 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 7

    Standard lager look and feel, perhaps one shade darker of p*ss yellow and perhaps one shade more of flavor, but all in all it is still crap...only it's imported, so inevitably costs more. Thankfully this was a freebie, I'd feel really stupid for spending money on it. Life's too short to drink swill. I tried to keep the numeric ratings in line with this style, as opposed to throwing it under the bus completely.

  • PIERRE 5 reviews
    rated 1.6 18 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 3

    This really is crap beer. It tastes like bitter muddy water. It's like an expensive version of VB, but even less drinkable. Heavily overpriced. Dirty dirty dirty, Oi oi oi.

  • JONMOORE 1367 reviews
    rated 2.5 18 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    Bottle. Golden colour with a slim white head. Some malt, some hops, some skunk in the aroma. Flavour was better than I was expecting, as in it had some. Sweet malts and light bitterness in the taste. Light body, moderate carbonation. I can’t say as I would seek it out again.

  • FOAMDOME 505 reviews
    rated 2.8 18 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5

    A good lager-lover's beer, a clear cut above the normal swill. Pale yellow body, plenty of carbonation, a white head. Can actually detect malt in the aroma and flavor, a distinguishing plus for the style. Better than Bud.

Discuss This Beer