Miller 1855 Celebration Lager

Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

Poured a darker color than anything i have had from Miller. There was not very much of a head when poured into a pint glass Had very little aroma at all.

Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 6

I enjoyed this . It had a fuller body than some of the other Miller products Standard color and aroma. It was quite drinkable and an interesting way to market. Heritage is always good.

Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5

I actually like the presentationofthis, like theold style label. Slightly darker golden than Miller High Life but with the same pure white small bubbly head. Again the aroma is slightly stronger and seems to ontain some maltiness..but its mostly very grassy. The taste is rather plain, but seems to have a bit of body, and a slight taste of real malts, some small hop bittering in the aftertaste. Nice mouthfeel actually quite "thick" for a macro. This is drinkable enough, mainlly because the carbonation is subdued compared to other Miller products..but really for a 150th anniversary beer I expected more.

Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

This beer poured a medium gold color topped by a decent sized white head that left no real lace. The aroma was grainy with some light hops as well. THe mouthfeel was light to medium bodied (more on the light side). The flavor was a very unoffensive pale lager in my oppinon. No strong adjunct flavors jumping out with a light hop flavor showing through in the finish.

Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 3

poured a yellow color with alot of carbination had a very small thin white head that left no lace the flavor was sweet and malty the mouthfeel was thin a a typical lager

Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

this was darker in color than i thought it would be coming from miller. although there was notvery much of a head when poured into a pint glass Had "small" smell to it

Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 4

This was a darker gold than I expected. A slight bit of hops in the aroma, but not a whole lot. Light straw and cornflakes in the flavor. Not really that bad. Nothing special, but better than the average BudMillerCoors lager.

Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

This is slightly better but very similar to MGD. It seemed to be a little more crisp than typical Miller and has less foul taste than MGD. I wouldn't buy this again but the six pack was drinkable.

Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 6

This beer did not disappoint me. I never expect large breweries to stray too far from their core brands. This is the best offering from Miller since they stop producing Lowenbrau. The aroma was relatively weak, but familiar like your favorite bar and the flavor was subtley pale. The mouthfeel impressed me with its crispness. I've never been one to dictate how a beer should appear because there are too many variations that still produce great beer drinking experiences. This is at least an average beer; I've drank far worse with a smile on my face.

Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

Pours clear corn-yellow. Sniffing...ouch! Smells and tastes of metal, corn-on-the-cob up a skunk's ass, and not much else. The label's not misleading -- this tastes like it's been aging for the last 150 years easy. Thanks, Clash (I guess).