Thirty Three Export

Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 7

a medium, stark-white head and a clear, golden appearance, with lots of lacing and little fine particles floating about. The aroma is of toasted barley and subtle spice. Taste is of toasted barley malt, grain, sweetness, and a light hop bitterness. Mouthfeel is a little watery but finishes crisp, refreshing, and easy drinking. This is a very good lager. Sampled this at the World of Beers, turns out it was the best beer of the night.

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

fairly generic and thin, though not entirely offensive. corn and grain, with a sligt hop bite and little else. watery feel. there are better pale lagers out there.

Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 8 | Overall: 5

A darker than clear-yellow beer. The head was robust and frothy. Hangs around eventually settling into my glass with lumps os soapy white on top. There’s a metallic smell coming up from the glass. Subtle. The hops comes through on first sip. A gentle bittering that makes this an okay drink.. The mouthfeel is thin and takes away from the above average flavoring.

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

Tried this one a while back to mark off another country on my beer passport. It is your typical crappy watery foreign pale lager. Not really worth the buy, pretty bland with corn and grain flavors.

Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 4

5.3% ABV, according to my can. 33 (although the label says 333) Export poured a standard yellow/gold colour matched up with a foamy white four-fingered head. The aroma was quite bitter, noticeable as soon as I snapped the can open. Taste was rather bitter and also somewhat 'sour', which I did not appreciate. Mouthfeel was not so dreadful, and at least the aftertaste was a little better thatn the initial shock. Probably would NOT have this one again...

Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 2

Pale gold with large bubbles and a head that lasted a couple seconds. Sweet and sour alcohol scent smelled like white wine. Maltier than initially expected but bitter too, balanced but light on flavor. Nothing very special, certainly overpriced here in the States.

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

A huge disappointment. In fact, this was unfinishable, and I'm not sorry to say that I dumped it after struggling through to mid-glass.

Extremely sythentic and "plastic-y" aroma and flavor. Tastes like someone dipped styrofoam into cheap beer, let it soak up some beer like a sponge, and then rung it out like a dishrag into a bottle and capped it.

Thin and lifeless mouthfeel, and nil overall drinkability. Hell, I can't even say it killed a thirst, since this was so dry and solvent-y that I was thirstier afterwards.

Dumped, and soon forgotten.
//TB

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

this beer poured a mild yellow color with the a off white head that did stay around for a bit. nothing great but you know what, it is very drinkable for mass consuption...hic

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

Straight 4's across the board. Below average but not skunky. Grassy malty base, typical of these swill lagers, this one had a balanced hoppy-maltiness, unlike some of the other oversweetened foreign swills I had tonite. But, either way, I'm not coming back to this one. Bye bye, Saigon.

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 2

Pours a very light golden yellow color, with very little head and lots of carbonation. Aroma is light and very "domestic lager-like"...not much discernable in the way of malts and hops; mainly rice extracts. Mouthfeel is thin and painfully crisp. Flavor is also thin and crisp, with rice being the only conceivable profile. Not a good beer (nor a "real beer" in my opinion).