Schlitz
Schlitz
Rated 2.090 by BeerPals
Brewed by MillerCoors LLC
Milwaukee, WI, United States
Style: Pale Lager
4.6% Alcohol by Volume
Availability of this beer is unknown
Sign Up to Participate:
No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?
ID: 9814 Last updated 2 weeks ago Added to database 20 years agoKey Stats
percentile
0
Drunk59
Reviews0
LikesBeeributes
Most noted beer attributes
None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.
Sign up to participateSimilar Beers
Statistics
| Overall Rank | 55464 |
| Overall Percentile | 0.1 |
| Style Rank | 1737 of 1769 |
| Style Percentile | 1.8 |
| Lowest Score | 1.0 |
| Highest Score | 4.1 |
| Average Score | 2.044 |
| Weighted Score | 2.090 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.770 |
Rating Distribution
Beer vs Style
59 Member Reviews
Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 8 | Overall: 7
Overall not a bad beer, Ive always been a fan of it. It's a brand that here locally has not always been readily available, but it may be making somewhat of a small comeback as some of the larger grocery store chains are begining to stock it. I drink it because it's cheap, and it doesnt taste like all the other "run of the mill" light lagers out there. It is a beer that needs to be drank very cold,it's taste dwindles as it warms, and it does leave a stong, somewhat "sticky" aftertaste.
-
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3
Aroma
- light grains
- light hops
- acidic
Appearance
- pale gold
- clear
- white head, lasts a few moments
Mouthfeel
- watery
- highly carbonated
Flavour
- less grainy than the aroma
- bitter finish
Overall
- smells better than it tastes, which adds to the disappointment -
Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
Drank this one many years ago and still remember it as awful. I remember none of my buddies could Stand it either. If my memory serves me correctly. We took a case to a party and there were unfinished bottles left all over the place.
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5
Hard to tell aroma and color as I am served this in a bottle. Some caramel and hop aroma, taste is sweet but hoppy. Short dry sweet aftertaste. (Houston 201208)
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4
Pours a clear golden color with an inch thick head that dissipates quickly and leaves a nice lacing. The aroma is a very nice sweetness upfront, kind of lemony. Corn, grains, and pale malts come through as well. The taste is sweet with corn, pale malts, grains, and buttery biscuits. The mouthfeel has a medium body with mild carbonation. The carbonation gives it a creamy texture. This beer was best when brewed by schlits itself, not much of a changed under PBR but there is a drop off under Miller/Coors. My rating based off the latest brewery M/C.
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 3
Splitz! This beer is pure Milwalkee trash. This is horrible. Do not waste your time drinking this supermarket swill. It is a waste of time and money. Forget it. you will thank me!
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 4
It pours a pale yellow with a sudsy and foamy white head and some strings of lacing. An aroma of sweet malts, faint hops, light lemon, and some funk but not too bad. The mouthfeel is thin and watery. Flavors of corn malts, light hops, lemon, and again some funk. Altogether it is cheap, but not too bad. I like PBR better though.
-
Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 5
It's as good as any Pabst I've ever had, and deffinitely a step up from Hamms and Strohs. The fact that you can only buy it in bottles is the only classy part of this beer. It's cheap and it's swill, go get some!
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 3
Same old, same old...as the other same old worn out versions of this overdone and watered down style of brew. Nothing special in flavor, compares to the Pabsts and Red White & Blues of yesteryear. Nostalgia is the only redeeming quality just like the others.
-
Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6
Not bad for a basic lager, plus it is good to see another retro label come back with some respectability. Aroma is average and nice, while appearance is a nice, clear light amber. Mouthfeel is decent, although the taste has an edge going out. Overall, an average, but respectable brew. On a historical note, I can still remember going to Milwaukee Brewer games as a kid back in the early to mid '70's when the beer vendors walked the aisles of County Stadium shouting "Cold Schlitz! Cold Shlitz!" Of course by then, the formulation was probably altered and things were headed down hill for once giant in the industry. It's sad, but, again, it's good to see the namesake back with some respectability.
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5
I actually picked up a case of this because it was so cheap; $11.59 for a caser! Anyway, typical North American swill here and is similar to Milwaukee's Best light and others in that category. This is a watery brew but does offer some corm malt and sweetness and has high poundibility for sure. I might actually buy this again given the fact it is even cheaper than some of my favorite swills I drink. Recommended brew if you just want to swill and drink and don't think; very unchallenging brew here but not bad.
