spinner

Hamms

Hamms

Rated 2.449 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by MillerCoors LLC

Milwaukee, WI, United States

Style:  Pale Lager

4.7% Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?

ID: 8856 Last updated 16 years ago Added to database 20 years ago

Key Stats

1
percentile

0

Drunk

38

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank48790
Overall Percentile1
Style Rank1455 of 1646
Style Percentile11.6
Lowest Score1.0
Highest Score5.0
Average Score2.405
Weighted Score2.449
Standard Deviation0.884

Rating Distribution

Beer vs Style

38 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
FISHBULB 50 reviews
rated 1.8 18 years ago

Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 4

The price is the only reason this beer is a 4.

  • FISHINGFAST 681 reviews
    rated 1.2 8 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

    I just found this on the worst beer list. I remember drinking it thirty years ago. This is what I remember it was cheap, yellow and had a big thick white head and tasted horrible. The best thing about this beer was the really cool cool commercials with the bear and the great jingle.

  • THIRSTYONE 563 reviews
    rated 3.3 8 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 7

    A friend of mine said he liked it, a low cost beer that is for sure. Not a bad aroma, and taste is not bad either. I have had cheap beer that is awful tasting, this is not bad at all. Was expecting much worse.Light yellow, a good thirst quencer in summer i bet.

  • JLOZIER 671 reviews
    rated 1.9 10 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

    Found this in one of those gift/liquor shops on Las Vegas Blvd. Surprised to see it, as I thought it was retired years ago. On special: 2 24-oz cans for $4. Ice cold + cheap = perfect Strip walking beer. Didn't pour it out of the can, but I'm sure it is straw yellow, with the fizzy white head. Flavors are corn and biscuits, exactly as expected. Better than expected, but now that I've had it, I never have to have it again.

  • RICHSBEER 1736 reviews
    rated 2.3 10 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    pours nice yellow, with a nice head that disappears quickly. Nice taste but does have a slight metallic taste when drinking from cans. Adding a little salt to this beer is a trick i use. must serve ice cold. Love their old 60's and 70's bar signs.

  • JERRYMORRISON 2130 reviews
    rated 2.4 11 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 6

    Have heard of it, had never seen it until last night. So I figured I would give it a spin, it's what you expect in flavor aroma, appearance,ect corn, and faint malts, kinda watery. But it's not offensive, and I like it better than the beast, lone star, bud, ect, a higher grade of swill.

  • HEYBEERMAN 1025 reviews
    rated 1.0 11 years ago

    Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

    Just an aweful aweful beer, I really can't think what it's good for. This is the kind of beer that even drunk college kids won't drink. I've heard it was better 30 years ago, I think these cans are probably hold overs from that time...

  • SUDSMCDUFF 3781 reviews
    rated 2.4 11 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 6

    Hello Mr. De-Sick-o. ..- DeChicco, my name is DeChicco. ... 12oz Can given to me by Omar, thank you good sir, now to marky's for some homebrewed IPA!! .. . Pours gold, low foam- zero lacing .. corn and dried hay .. . basic, not to bad for a cheapo but still .. . On second thought, I better not chew and drive. ..

  • TREBORIUS 308 reviews
    rated 1.5 11 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    I remember this beer when it was bottled in the 60s.....now when I see it, it is always canned. Again, another foul smelling, bland tasting, watery swill that costs almost nothing when purchased in large quantities!

  • FARGINGBASTIGE6 1476 reviews
    rated 1.5 12 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 3

    This is just pure old old-school drunk uncle at the cookout beer. While not the nastiest out there, it is without a doubt among the contenders. It's just nasty out there.

  • SLOWRUNNER77 5682 reviews
    rated 1.5 13 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    it's starting to get relly hard to differentiate between all these nasty pale lagers. This one was slighlty more bearable than some others. Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

Discuss This Beer