spinner

Amstel Light

Amstel Light

Rated 2.552 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by Heineken Brouwerijen Besloten Vennootschap

Hertogenbosch, Netherlands

Style:  Light / Lite Lager

3.5% Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?

ID: 2109 Last updated 1 week ago Added to database 23 years ago

Key Stats

2
percentile

0

Drunk

114

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank54527
Overall Percentile1.6
Style Rank442 of 570
Style Percentile22.5
Lowest Score1.3
Highest Score4.0
Average Score2.540
Weighted Score2.552
Standard Deviation0.571

Rating Distribution

Beer vs Style

114 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
SIGMUND 7103 reviews
rated 1.9 19 years ago

Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

Well, if the ordinary Amstel isn't bland enough for you... God bless! There's really not much to say in favour of this brew - but a glass of it IS drinkable if you have to drive afterwards.

  • VIPINVELP 2001 reviews
    rated 2.4 8 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 5

    Clear pale yellow, big white foam head. Barley aroma similar in taste, light indeed. Moderate taste, aftertaste almost non existing. OK beer for airport lounge. (London 201608)

  • PALEALERIDER 2314 reviews
    rated 2.7 9 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5

    Pours a huge foamy white head and has a clear straw coloured appearance. Thick patchy lacing. Aromas of grains, corn and a bit of skunky hints. Flavours are mainly grainy malts, wheats and again with the corn. Weak hops. Seems like a light version of Heineken, which would make sense. It's got that fairly similar skunkiness to it, but not in the offensive way. Light bodied and faint carbonation. Still not too bad for a macro type light brew.

  • FISHINGFAST 685 reviews
    rated 1.4 10 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

    I liked the deep yellow and the light malt aroma. Besides that the only good thing I can say about this beer is it pours a think white foamy head. After those facts there really isn't anything good about this beer.

  • RICHSBEER 1967 reviews
    rated 3.0 12 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

    A nice beer for a lite. Pleasent hops taste, nice color. It purs with a weak head on my glass. Low carbonation. It has a nice palate for being a light beer. Better by far than most american light beers.

  • FUNK 898 reviews
    rated 2.5 12 years ago

    Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    Really not an awful beer for the style. Not worth the premium price compared to most American light lagers though. No skunky aroma makes it better than Heineken Lager at least (granted, that isn't saying much).

  • LENUSIK 2067 reviews
    rated 3.0 13 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

    I think this is only available in North America because none of my European friends claim to have seen it (although most of my European friends are skeptical of diet beer to begin woth). This is one of the better light beers. Not in the same class as a British bitter, but refreshing all the same. Pale gold colour, grainy malt, floral hops, and a typical lager flavour....but not as watered down as a Bud Light.

  • FARGINGBASTIGE6 1476 reviews
    rated 2.1 13 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

    I'd like to say it wasn't hateful... but it really is. Based on my observations this weekend, the people who buy/drink/think this is good, quality beer have apparently been raised on Natty Light and the like. Drank from the bottle, so I can't judge the appearance - but I can't leave the dropdown blank, so I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt and going with "average". Smells grassy and very carbonated and thin on the pallette. lacks any discernable flavor... or maybe a bit alka-seltzeresque. Now I know why I never bought it.

  • STOUTLOVER72 2327 reviews
    rated 2.3 13 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    12oz bottle -

    Pour is a pale yellow, crystal clear with a quickly dissipating 1" white foamy head. Aroma is slighly salty somehow with a light punch of grainy malts. Flavor seems...vacant. Nothing. Zip. Like carbonated water. My mind seems to be filling in the missing parts and I think I tasted some light grain. Watery body. Nothing really, either good or bad. Definitely reduced calories, alcohol, which means reduced flavor too. Not a suprise.

  • TRAPEZEMONK 71 reviews
    rated 3.5 13 years ago

    Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 7

    I give this an above average for a light beer. When I drink a light beer it has to be Amstel. I like the fact that it is a light flavor beer with the taste of a beer. It is unlike most light beer because it seems to retain that pils flavor I have however got a slight slight skunk wiff every now and then.

  • RJA 2975 reviews
    rated 2.2 14 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 4

    On this one I got a bright golden colored beer. A medium fuzzy textured white head rises ever so briefly above. There’s no hang time. And, there’s no lacing. There are light grains in the nose and a watered grain in the tasting. It is very light and carbonated. All in all, there’s nothing offensive in this one.

Discuss This Beer