Busch NA
Busch NA
Rated 1.474 by BeerPalsBrewed by Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
St. Louis, MO, United StatesStyle: Reduced Alcohol
0.4% Alcohol by Volume
Availability of this beer is unknown
Sign Up to Participate:
The company's first subpremium-priced, non-alcohol brew debuted in 1994.
ID: 10624 Last updated 1 month ago Added to database 20 years agoKey Stats
percentile
0
Drunk24
Reviews0
LikesBeeributes
Most noted beer attributes
None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.
Sign up to participateSimilar Beers
Statistics
Overall Rank | 56184 |
Overall Percentile | 0 |
Style Rank | 467 of 467 |
Style Percentile | 0 |
Lowest Score | 1.0 |
Highest Score | 3.0 |
Average Score | 1.283 |
Weighted Score | 1.474 |
Standard Deviation | 0.546 |
Rating Distribution
Beer vs Style
24 Member Reviews
-
-
Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3
Pretty sure I had this plenty o times in my younger years. Gets the job done as a lawnmower beer, but that's about it. Too thin and watery (and flavorless) to make any kind of mark.
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
Pours a thin straw yellow color with a thick white head and lots of carbonation and no lacing. Smells of corn and nothing else. Not much to the taste -- a little sweet a little canned creamed corn and some salt. Mouthfeel is really thin and drinkability is extemely poor.
-
Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3
For a non-alcoholic, this is far from the worst beer out there. The colour is quite decent, and you can get a sense of hops in the aroma. If only it tasted better.
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
As if Busch products weren't bad enough, they've got a non-alcoholic in the line-up! I would drink Busch just to get drunk if I was in a bind but take away the alcohol and then what's left? Self loathing, that's what.
-
Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6
Pours a light yellow, good foam for a NA .. . tastes just like a lighter version of busch light .. . i tricked Judy with it .. . as far as NA's goes this is abit below average .. . how come when i wear basketball shorts, my butt starts smelling?
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
Woo hoo. Crappy taste and no alcohol. This is the best idea that I've ever heard. WHy would I drink this? Oh wait., I wouldn't. By the way, the texas horns like bareback male on male action. Just ask Mack Brown. His nickname isn't "BACK BROWN" for nothing.
-
Aroma: 5 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3
I was gagged with this brew. Although if the beer has no alcohol in it, was actually brewed? I have to admit it didn't taste that bad at first, a watered down Labatt Blue was my thought
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
For real!...I get why NA beers are around, and some may actually have some sort of resemblance of decent beer...but Busch..NA...WHY? Busch is absolutely awful to begin with...taking out the alcohol just makes it polluted water...industrial waste. Please, do yourself a favor...if you are looking to try an NA beer for any reason...look elsewhere.
-
Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
This beer has no redeeming qualities whatsoever, unless you happened to be the designated driver. They say that water is tasteless, odorless, and colorless....this is the beer equivalent of water...although there is worse.
-
Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 2 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2
I remember getting this beer often in the bottle because we thought that it taste better than in the can. It tastes like warm, stale beer even if it is brand new and ice cold. You have to get it teeth-rattlin cold just to stomach it. Only drank it because it was very cheap and the store was out of Stroh's. Many completely unwarranted hangovers from this horse whizz.