spinner

Rolling Rock Light

Rolling Rock Light

Rated 2.132 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by Latrobe Brewing Company

Latrobe, PA, United States

Style:  Light / Lite Lager

? % Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?

ID: 9652 Last updated 2 weeks ago Added to database 20 years ago

Key Stats

0
percentile

0

Drunk

16

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank55520
Overall Percentile0.2
Style Rank543 of 570
Style Percentile4.7
Lowest Score1.0
Highest Score3.4
Average Score1.969
Weighted Score2.132
Standard Deviation0.681

Rating Distribution

Beer vs Style

16 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
  • CYBERCAT 13049 reviews
    rated 1.6 12 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 3

    Aroma is - well, it's weak but at least it's malty and not watery. Not at all impressive. It pours a wan clear straw yellow with a fairly thick white head that fizzles out quickly. Flavor is actually better than I expected - unlike most light beers I have tried, it really does taste like beer. It's malty, and that's about it - although it doesn't seem watery. Body and fizz both leave something to be desired. Good only when compared to other light beers - otherwise fuhgeddaboudit.

  • RICHSBEER 1967 reviews
    rated 2.7 12 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 5

    Pours a pale golden yellow that's completely see-through. There's some short lived, soapy, fizzy head when first poured. The nose is sweet and corny with yeasty undertone. The taste is similar. It's very light and sweet with grainy, corn notes. The mouthfeel is super light, a little dry, very crisp, but smooth and easy to drink back in the day.

  • LENUSIK 2067 reviews
    rated 1.5 13 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    There's not much to say about this beer, and what there is to say is not good. A clear piss yellow pour with a fizzy white head. A weak grainy malt aroma with almost no hop presence. The flavour is slightly beerier than water, but not much.

  • HEYBEERMAN 1025 reviews
    rated 1.6 13 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    First off, Rolling Rock original is already a light beer! Second off, to call this a pale ale is a disgrace and shame to the style. Third off, this beer doesn't even taste like anything. Fourth, they are now owned by AB so you should know better.

  • RJA 2975 reviews
    rated 3.1 13 years ago

    Aroma: 7 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

    A deep clear golden colored beer. A small fuzzy textured, white head rises briefly. A fairly thick soapy ringlet is left behind. Nose is sweet corn and grassy hops. The taste the same, just a bit more pronounced. Nothing offensive in this one. Medium bodied, nicely carbonated and a degree of smoothness, make this one a pretty good thirst quencher

  • JKBPILL 201 reviews
    rated 1.4 13 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    Just a way to get people who think that rolling rock is the sophiticated brew to feel better about themselves because it is light, with the light the beer loses what little taste the beer had, there is really no aroma and the appearance is toilet water.

  • SLOWRUNNER77 5682 reviews
    rated 1.5 14 years ago

    Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    typical very pale yellow fizzy water. awful aroma and smell with a slightly skunked flavor that is barely better. not a good beer, but neither is the other RR, so no surprises here.

  • JERRYMORRISON 2130 reviews
    rated 1.9 16 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 3

    Rolling rock is a fairly decent mass produced beer, so thier light version cant be that bad right? Well it certianly is not very good even for a light beer. Flavor wasnt very good , watery mouthfeel, overall its middle of the pack for a light beer.

  • FARGINGBASTIGE6 1476 reviews
    rated 1.9 16 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 4

    The flavor is virtually non-existent. I though the regular Rolling Rock was pretty light, but this is close to being Beck's Premium Light - light.

  • WHOCHEE 11 reviews
    rated 1.4 18 years ago

    Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 3 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 2

    I had one of these things this afternoon and it was truly disgusting. I even tried chocking it down with it on ice and it was still nasty. I was surprised it had only 83 calories, and yet it still was an awful flavor.

Discuss This Beer