Mendocino Peregrine Golden Ale
Mendocino Peregrine Golden Ale
Rated 2.655 by BeerPalsBrewed by Mendocino Brewing Company
Ukiah, CA, United StatesStyle: Blonde Ale
5% Alcohol by Volume
Availability of this beer is unknown
Sign Up to Participate:
No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?
ID: 3728 Last updated 1 month ago Added to database 23 years agoKey Stats
percentile
0
Drunk6
Reviews0
LikesBeeributes
Most noted beer attributes
None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.
Sign up to participateSimilar Beers
Statistics
Overall Rank | 54330 |
Overall Percentile | 3.1 |
Style Rank | 1459 of 1500 |
Style Percentile | 2.7 |
Lowest Score | 1.6 |
Highest Score | 3.7 |
Average Score | 2.483 |
Weighted Score | 2.655 |
Standard Deviation | 0.778 |
Rating Distribution
Beer vs Style
6 Member Reviews
-
-
Aroma: 4 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 5
this one was sub par and easily avoidabl even a few years ago when i liked other Mendo brews better. thin, boring, yada yada yada. what else is there to say?
-
Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6
Another beer that doesnt have much to it. My wife likes it though.
-
Aroma: 8 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 7 | Flavor: 8 | Overall: 7
More from my many trips through the singles section of the beer aisle at Trader Joes (at place that doesn't care you break up six-packs, either). And while I know I've had various beers from the Mendocino Brewing Company from both bottle and draught at the Hopland brewpub, I'm sure I don't remember having this before. It's an odd one, that's for sure.
More of a bitter Wheat ale than a light/golden Pale Ale, this reminds of the time that I wanted to brew a standard American Hefeweizen, and screwed up the math, and ended up with a very bitter (albeit tasty) wheat ale. Same deal here, I suspect. This even has the signature big-ass head of foam that comes with the extra proteins found in wheat-based beers.
Hybrid beer or not, it's not bad at all. It's been a long time since I've had an "old school" Cascade-only ale, and this is certianly showing it's age (supposedly first brewed 20 years ago). The mouthfeel is a bit too slick for my taste, and as a result, the drinkability take a hit in my book, but overall, this is not the worst example of the Golden Ale "style". (Probably more interesting if it was off the tap, but that's another thing altogether).
//TB -
Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6
Light gold color, small head. Mild ale with a slight hop flavor, nice malty taste. Finish is crisp, not a lot of bitterness. Crisp and mild. Nice flavor
-
Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 4 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 4 | Overall: 3
Pretty average looking golden ale..that is light golden colour, tiny white head, minimal lace. The aroma is weird,maybe Im going crazy ( or nuts) but i detect roasted peanuts in the shell..salty strange. Flavour is almost lager like again I get a faint taste of rosted peanut..sickly aftertaste. Pretty average on the palate..aftertaste is not good though. Not that drinkable..a bad Golden ale
-
Aroma: 3 | Appearance: 5 | Mouthfeel: 3 | Flavor: 3 | Overall: 2
Is this a joke?!?!?! Did Mendocino secretly put Coors Light into a nice looking bottle and charge $7.50 for a sixer? Pour looks like a cheap swill beer, yellow and bubbly, only with no head. Aroma is of cheap swill with a weird sweetness to it (kind of like cheap wine). Taste and mouthfeel are that of Coors Light and cheap wine. I am dumbfounded here...