Categories

  • All Discussions
  • Hottest Topics
  • My Discussions
  • Specific Beers
  • Specific Brewers
  • General Beer Talk
  • Website
  • Non-Beer Talk
  • Industry News
  • Beer Events
  • Beer and Food
  • BeerPal Polls
  • Unreplied
  • Popular All Time

BRETT
25065

BRETT
25065

BRETT
25065

Bashing a Micro's Macros

General Beer Discussion by BRETT

Ever notice how many micro's most popular beers are often the target of negative comments and/or criticisms? Examples: New Belgium Fat Tire, Rogue Dead Guy Ale. Can anyone note any other examples? Do any of you think this criticism is fair, or are beer nerds just bashing these beers because they are mainstream?


19 years ago
# 1
# 1

COTTRELL
19268

In Reply To #1 I'd say it's justified more than 50% of the time. The most popular beer for a brewery, or their flagship, is usually a fairly unchallenging beer. A brewery can't survive selling an extreme beer as their flagship, which tend to be the beers that critics prefer. That said, a lot of breweries have excellent flagships, Troutbrook's APA is awesome, as is Sierra Nevada's Pale Ale.

19 years ago
# 2
# 2

I think I tend to fall in between the two comments. I do think "beer nerds" as Mr. Brett put it tend to bash beers because they are mainstream. Even if they are rather good. Before I even read Cottrell's post the first beer that came to my mind was Sierra Nevada Pale Ale. I think certain Sam Adams get bashed because they are too mainstream for some. However, Cottrell makes a great point that brewers tend to make "lesser" beers their flagship brew, then offer more complex, more flavorful selections as seasonal specials, etc. that may be a little pricier. Another point. A brewers flagship beer so to speak tends to be a beer that appeals to a larger population, and lets face it, not everyone is a "beer nerd" are into the details of drinking a beer, ie. write reviews for a beer website ;) SC

19 years ago
# 3
# 3

PKSMITH
7945

I tend to agree that maybe flagship brews get a sometimes unfair bashing. If not for the more "mainstream" brews some brewers market, the less popular (read: better) brews probably wouldn't support the brewers. Here's hoping that there's a noble thougth process behind this, that process being that if there's a brew that appeals and appeases the masses, money is available to do true craft brews to be enjoyed by those who may have more discerning tastes.

19 years ago
# 4
# 4

BRETT
25065

BRETT
25065

In Reply To #4 "Here's hoping that there's a noble thougth process behind this, that process being that if there's a brew that appeals and appeases the masses, money is available to do true craft brews to be enjoyed by those who may have more discerning tastes." Exactly. A good example of this might be the sales of Fat Tire (probably a cash cow at this point) enabling New Belgium to put out La Folie or Transatlantique Kriek. I'm sure it was a big investment to get those projects off the ground.

19 years ago
# 5
# 5

The flagships have another crucial purpose as well, introducing 'the ignorant masses', 'the unwashed' , 'the BMC worshipers' or whatever everyone is called (hehe)to decent beer. I've gotten quite a number of my friends interesting in craft brews because of Boulevard's Wheat Beer and Bob's 47, also Schlafly's 1904 Lager and Sierra Nevada Pale Ale.

19 years ago
Sign up to participate!