Categories

  • All Discussions
  • Hottest Topics
  • My Discussions
  • Specific Beers
  • Specific Brewers
  • General Beer Talk
  • Website
  • Non-Beer Talk
  • Industry News
  • Beer Events
  • Beer and Food
  • BeerPal Polls
  • Unreplied
  • Popular All Time

Pretty Things February 27th 1832 Mild Ale

Beer Discussion by STOUTLOVER72

BeerPal Notice: This topic was created for discussion of the beer Pretty Things February 27th 1832 Mild Ale. A 10.5% mild ale. Just because a brewer calls their beer something, doesn't make it so. I'm not a category freak, but somethings that look like a duck and quack like a duck should be called a duck, not a moose.

Go to the page


13 years ago
# 1
# 1

CYRENAICA
447557

quote: Originally posted by Stoutlover72
BeerPal Notice: This topic was created for discussion of the beer <a href="../Pretty-Things-February-27th-1832-Mild-Ale-Beer/38851/">Pretty Things February 27th 1832 Mild Ale</a>. A 10.5% mild ale. Just because a brewer calls their beer something, doesn't make it so. I'm not a category freak, but somethings that look like a duck and quack like a duck should be called a duck, not a moose.
They are probably newcomers to beer having tried the BrewDog Sink the Bismarck as a 'regular' ale..................no? :)

13 years ago
# 2
# 2

KINGER
40797

KINGER
40797

American Strong Mild now warrants a new style category, just don't call it a Black or Cascadian Mild for heads shall rolllllllllllll

13 years ago
# 3
# 3

English Strong Ale

13 years ago
# 4
# 4

JLOZIER
16057

JLOZIER
16057

Looks like another case of terms taking on different meaning over time. It certainly seems to be a mild ale by the historical context that they are referencing...so is it really a misnomer? Nevertheless, I can see the style being listed as something more relevant to modern identification. ...a bit like identifying Abraham Lincoln as a Republican, no?

13 years ago
# 5
# 5

quote: Originally posted by jlozier
Looks like another case of terms taking on different meaning over time. It certainly seems to be a mild ale by the historical context that they are referencing...so is it really a misnomer? Nevertheless, I can see the style being listed as something more relevant to modern identification. ...a bit like identifying Abraham Lincoln as a Republican, no?
Well if looking at it from a historical context, I would have some...reservations, a beer from 1832 being 10% alcohol and being hoppy and...again..being a mild. Mild beers were fresh beers, not fresh, incredibly strong and really hoppy beers. I haven't read much evidence of hops being used for flavor/aroma like hey are now in 1832 in milds. So I don't think one brewers exception making a strong mild, is considered a strong mild, but rather what Suds said which I thought it was exactly what it was and that's an English Strong Ale.

13 years ago
# 6
# 6

JLOZIER
16057

JLOZIER
16057

quote: Originally posted by Stoutlover72 [br}Mild beers were fresh beers
That seems to be the only qualification that the brewer claims...that is all I was referring to.

13 years ago
# 7
# 7

quote: Originally posted by jlozier
quote: quote: Originally posted by Stoutlover72 [br}Mild beers were fresh beers
That seems to be the only qualification that the brewer claims...that is all I was referring to.
10-4

13 years ago
Sign up to participate!