Thunder Canyon Dry River Pils
Thunder Canyon Dry River Pils
Rated 3.100 by BeerPalsBrewed by Thunder Canyon Brewery
Tucson, AZ, United StatesStyle: Bohemian / Czech Pilsener
? % Alcohol by Volume
Availability of this beer is unknown
Sign Up to Participate:
Described by the brewer as a much more malty and not as hoppy as their Prescription Pilsner
ID: 31205 Last updated 2 weeks ago Added to database 16 years agoKey Stats
percentile
0
Drunk1
Review0
LikesBeeributes
Most noted beer attributes
None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.
Sign up to participateSimilar Beers
Statistics
Overall Rank | 36700 |
Overall Percentile | 33.9 |
Style Rank | 742 of 1886 |
Style Percentile | 60.7 |
Lowest Score | 3.4 |
Highest Score | 3.4 |
Average Score | 3.400 |
Weighted Score | 3.100 |
Standard Deviation | 0.000 |
Rating Distribution
Not enough reviews for this chartBeer vs Style
1 Member Reviews
-
-
Aroma: 8 | Appearance: 7 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 7 | Overall: 6
Sampled on tap at the brewery
This beer arrives with a half-finger thick, pale, white colored head. The color is quite gold and is not quite perfectly clear. The aroma smells very malt focused for a Pils; grassy grain notes, a touch of malt sweetness and even something that is almost like corn. There is a faint, herbal hop aroma here, but it is somewhat muted.The flavor has more of a herbal hop character than the aroma suggested and there is a bitterness that contributes a nice bite to the finish. Sweet malt notes and a clean grain character are evident and in fact noticeable enough that this does not quite have the hop focus that a Pils should have. This has a fuller mouthfeel from the more noticeable malt character.
This is not really typical of a Pils in that it is more malty; the sweetness gets in the way of the crisp, dry character that is typical of a German Pils. The malt fullness is somewhat like a Bohemian Pilsner, but it does not have the malt complexity, nor the ample, balancing hop character of that type. Not bad, it just seems to miss the mark a bit.