spinner

Nude Beer

Nude Beer

Rated 2.667 by BeerPals
No Image Available

Brewed by Farmhouse Brewing Co.

Gilroy, CA, United States

Style:  Lager

? % Alcohol by Volume

Availability of this beer is unknown


Sign Up to Participate:



No beer description available, which means BeerPal needs your help to write one. Why not check out the brewer's website and see what you can learn?

ID: 12874 Last updated 19 years ago Added to database 19 years ago

Key Stats

3
percentile

0

Drunk

3

Reviews

0

Likes

0 Member Photos

No photos yet. Show us yours!

Sign up to share your photos

Beeributes

Most noted beer attributes

None to date - be the first! Beeributes help BeerPal predict what beers you'll love.

Sign up to participate

Statistics

Overall Rank51704
Overall Percentile3.3
Style Rank971 of 1066
Style Percentile8.9
Lowest Score1.3
Highest Score3.0
Average Score2.333
Weighted Score2.667
Standard Deviation0.000

Rating Distribution

Not enough reviews for this chart

Beer vs Style

3 Member Reviews

Recent | Card View | Table View
  • EYECHARTBREW 1451 reviews
    rated 2.7 18 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 5 | Flavor: 5 | Overall: 5

    Yes, despite getting a load of crap from my buds, I picked up a bottle of this for something like $0.50. Reviewing beer can be a tough job sometimes, but I'm willing to be who "takes one for the team"... ;)

    Nice eye-candy on the label -- a topless asian gal with very nice..., um..., er..., "eyes", so to speak. ;^) But while that may appeal to (male) beer bottle collectors, what's the beer within taste like? Surprisngly, not horrible.

    Basic pale gold in appearence, with a perfunctory head that quickly disipates. Equaly basic and unethusiastic aroma, with some old-school hopping -- Cluster, maybe Willamette?

    More old-school ale inklings in the taste department -- definately not your typical West Coast Pale Ale here. Has the classic "catty" Cluster taste, that tends to repulse Pale Ale drinekrs from both the U.K. and the West Coast. I'm not neccesarily repulsed, but, at the same time, it's obvious that it's not my style. Not inherently wrong or flawed, but a hop that I don't care to deal with.

    Adequate mouthfeel, though it does tend to highlight subtle flaws in the malt-bill that would have otherwise been hidden away. A bit sulphurous in the extreme backend, as well.

    Drnkability is always gauged (in my book) by asking "would I want to drink nothing but this beer all night long"? Inherent flaws and personal feelings not withstanding, I would say "No thanks".

    I expected much worse from this, to be honest. But while this isn't truly horrible, it's nothing that I can recommend. Enjoy the eye-candy on the label, since the beer within is nothing to whistle at.
    //TB

  • BEERGUY101 5022 reviews
    rated 3.0 18 years ago

    Aroma: 6 | Appearance: 6 | Mouthfeel: 6 | Flavor: 6 | Overall: 6

    Light orange gold color, Small white foamy head. Aroma is hoppy and grainy. A medium bodied lager beer. Malts are sweet. Hops are slightly spicy. Its sweet and fruity with some hop bite to it, not at all what I expected. A smooth tasting, nicely balanced lager. I was expected some sort of macro tasting swill, but this ënudeí beerí, although gimmicky, it very drinkable. But I would not want to have to drink it all the time. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter and a little metallic.

  • VAC 2186 reviews
    rated 1.3 19 years ago

    Aroma: 2 | Appearance: 2 | Mouthfeel: 4 | Flavor: 2 | Overall: 3

    This beer sucks. There’s no aroma and it tastes like crap. Hopefully everyone won't be distracted by the naked lady on the label and give this a better rating than it disserves.

Discuss This Beer