Click here to see a sortable list of this Beer's Reviews

#3 Review by Beerhawk from Toronto, Canada
Score: 1.9 | Aroma 4 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 4 | Flavor 4 | Overall 4 |
I agree with the lads, this is swill trying to go up market.. decent apperance but no aroma to speak of. Taste is alittle sharper than blue or Canadian but really no mouthfeel, and quite sweet. I like it more than the rousse, but only slightly
1/13/2008 3:37:56 PM |
0
0 
#2 Review by Chopz from Cantley, Canada
Score: 2.1 | Aroma 6 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 3 | Flavor 4 | Overall 5 |
This beer is getting bashed for trying to look like a microbrew, but being brewed by Labatt's. Testing both of them tonight. The label does look nice though. Pours a golden colour with active carbonation. The head is pretty impressive for a macro lager. White, foamy and creamy, with lots of retention, leaving decent lacing all around. Smell of fresh malt at first pour, but then turns into some kind of adjunct aroma. Watery mouthfeel with a certain graininess to it. The taste is somewhat metallic at first, with a little malt and a smoke undertone in the finish. Kind of weird, but not really horrible. Swill material for sure.
7/30/2007 11:51:27 PM |
0
0 
#1 Review by Phil B from Gatineau, Canada
Score: 1.3 | Aroma 2 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 2 | Flavor 3 | Overall 3 |
Bottle: Poured a golden yellow color beer with a small foamy head with minimal retention. Aroma of adjunct is quite evident and gross. Taste is also dominated by adjunct with a very gross sweet aspect which I really didn’t enjoy. This one is really worst then the rousse.
7/27/2007 12:38:22 PM |
0
0 
 
×

Review Comments


No comments yet. Be the first!