Click here to see a sortable list of this Beer's Reviews

< Previous Page   Next Page >
#14 Review by PaulCardom from Stittsville, Ontario, Canada
Score: 1.6 | Aroma 4 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 3 | Flavor 3 | Overall 3 |
Looks cheap, tastes cheap, and thankfully is cheap. You won't get drunk, but you waon't spend a lot of money while finding that out either. Another in a long line of bland, colourless palee lagers from the kettles at Labatt.
6/6/2011 11:31:27 AM |
0
0 
#13 Review by myke from T-dot, Canada
Score: 3.2 | Aroma 5 | Appearance 7 | Mouthfeel 6 | Flavor 7 | Overall 7 |
You know, this ain't half bad. I do prefer the Wildcat Strong, but for macro swill, this is damn tasty. Kinda reminds me of PBR. While this is pretty damn special as far as swill goes, as usual with these types, the appearance leaves much to be desired, with a standard golden colour and a weak head. Like most swill, better sampled from the bottle. Unlike most swill, not bad out of the glass.
7/7/2008 8:53:29 PM |
0
0 
#12 Review by lenusik from Montreal (Verdun), Canada
Score: 2 | Aroma 4 | Appearance 4 | Mouthfeel 4 | Flavor 4 | Overall 4 |
I'm not sure what market Labatt was aiming for when they started producing this swill, sure wasn't St. Lawrence Market or Kensington Market. A bargain priced beer with a bargain priced taste (or lack thereof). Typical Canadian lager look and smell (i.e. skunky) but no taste. Feels like water, tastes like water, but the fish died in it so it can't be water!
7/8/2007 9:23:30 PM |
0
0 
#11 Review by clarkyo from Halifax, Canada
Score: 2.5 | Aroma 6 | Appearance 5 | Mouthfeel 4 | Flavor 4 | Overall 6 |
Ok this beer is what it is. It is cheap and goes down like water. When you are running low on coin this is never a bad choice. Sure it is not great but hey, it's beer
12/16/2006 5:43:40 PM |
0
0 
#10 Review by BigBry from Calgary, Canada
Score: 2.7 | Aroma 6 | Appearance 5 | Mouthfeel 5 | Flavor 5 | Overall 6 |
355 ml can with the stalking cougar, An economy (cheap) beer: $8.47CAN includes deposit and tax - to be drank after playing ball or camping, directly from the can. Ended up with a couple left overs in the cooler. Color is slightly darker straw than most micro-fizz, large chunky white foam that grows right after the pour. The smell is a bit sour sweet, but with a lot of corn. You can taste the adjunct sweetness, the alcohol burn, and a sourish aftertaste. No carbonation after the pour, left no head and no real mouthfeel. Drinkability: accept it for what it is, a cheap alternative. Lawnmower, camping, etc. - chug it cold.
9/11/2006 10:16:17 AM |
0
0 
#9 Review by Chopz from Cantley, Canada
Score: 1.8 | Aroma 4 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 3 | Flavor 4 | Overall 4 |
Says "No preservatives" on bottom of can, and 4.9% ABV. Pours a light golden-yellow colour with a foamy white head. Medium dissipation and not much lace. Lightly carbonated. Malty nose with some alcohol. After sitting there, the aroma goes very low in scent and some sweetness if felt. Thin and watery mouthfeel. Grainy malt and corn taste, with some metallic notes. Overall, refreshing and cheap.
1/22/2006 11:54:24 PM |
0
0 
#8 Review by FumbDuck from Thompson, Canada
Score: 1.7 | Aroma 4 | Appearance 2 | Mouthfeel 4 | Flavor 3 | Overall 4 |
Have had this beer a couple times, as the name implys "Wildcat" this is a beer that can be enjoyed while fishing or hunting small rodents. Take this over its partner WildCat Strong, be very lucky to finish a case of that poison.
11/25/2005 2:00:09 AM |
0
0 
#7 Review by that_guy from Hollywood, Manitoba, Canada
Score: 1.2 | Aroma 2 | Appearance 3 | Mouthfeel 2 | Flavor 3 | Overall 2 |
Never again. If your looking for get drunk off a cheap beer, spend less money and grap an OE or something else, this really is a horrible tasting beer.. ive seen on more then one occassion this beer getting passed around a party because no one wants it. smells like big foots dick.
9/25/2005 2:36:02 PM |
0
0 
#6 Review by pootz from between Calgary and Waterloo, Canada
Score: 1.2 | Aroma 2 | Appearance 2 | Mouthfeel 3 | Flavor 2 | Overall 3 |
Given one of these at a community bar BQ. One of the worst beers I ever tasted...certainly the worst in Canada IMHO. Pale, fizzy (over carbonated) Smells of corn or rice sweetness and CO2...poorly aged (if at all) with a rough edge that grates the palate and tongue from the ample use of corn adjunct and CO2....not a redeeming factor in my opinion.
8/19/2005 8:44:00 PM |
0
0 
#5 Review by Alcoholic from winnipeg, Canada
Score: 2.8 | Aroma 5 | Appearance 5 | Mouthfeel 6 | Flavor 6 | Overall 6 |
It doesnt taste too bad considering the amount of alcohol it has. I wouldnt be drinking it normally but I wouldnt call a guy down for drinking this stuff.
7/9/2005 9:12:12 PM |
0
0 
 
< Previous Page   Next Page >
×

Review Comments


No comments yet. Be the first!