[1] Review by Clash from Chattanooga, TN, USA who has tried this beer once. (9/2/2006 5:53:54 AM)
"Vertical from 1996-2004. These 1998 and earlier are getting past thier prime. A dark brown appearance with little head. The spice has died and a yeasty funky flavor has taken over. Some chocolate and caramel flavors. In this year 2006 Id say stay out of the 1990s vintages."
Aroma:
7/10
Appearance:
7/10
Mouthfeel:
6/10
Flavor:
7/10
Overall:
6/10
Final Rating, by Style:
(3.3)
Sampled: Bottle
Value of this beer for its style: Not Sure
[2] Review by OrvalPlease from Orland Park, IL, USA who has tried this beer a couple times. (12/13/2005 10:48:13 PM)
"1996 Edition (that I socked away from a 6-pack)
Deep rich color that poured out looking like motor oil - not much head left. Aroma still had strong spice notes present - nutmeg, cinnamon, cloves; hardly any trace of malt or hops in the nose. The spices also came to the fore in the flavor and were joined by a piney flavor that seemed like it belonged. Finish ended up on a sweet note, almost like the taste of bubble gum. Very interesting - I can hold back a bottle a year for this experience somewhere down the line."
Aroma:
8/10
Appearance:
7/10
Mouthfeel:
6/10
Flavor:
7/10
Overall:
7/10
Final Rating, by Style:
(3.5)
Sampled: Bottle
Value of this beer for its style: Not Sure
[3] Review by EyeChartBrew from CA, Liechtenstein who has tried this beer a couple times. (7/19/2005 10:10:30 PM)
"Both tasted as part of "O'Brien's Seven-Year Anchor Our Special Ale Vertical Tasting" event, 17JAN04.
~ 1997 Batch, from a 1,5L Magnum, 4-oz sample:
Very sherry/wine-like in presentation. Subtle but noticeable oxidation notes, that weren't as off-putting as would normally be the case, IMO. Black and Red Licorice notes (that is to say, anise and sugary, at the same time), along with the curious taste sensation (mint?) in the finish.
Overall:
As expected, the most complex of the flight of seven OSA's, and probably not for everybody. In fact, some of the folks at the tasting said this was damn-near unfinishable (due to the sherry-n'-oxidation notes). I wouldn't go that far, but can easily see how samples much older than this might not be worth investing truly big bucks in.
~ 1998 Batch, from a 1,5L Magnum, 4-oz sample:
Chocolate-covered cherries? That was my first impression of this vintage. Quite thick and vicious, that seemingly oozed down the throat more than anything else. Nuetral and a bit subdued in the finish, and perhaps a touch sweet, that tended to almost hide the slight oxidation that had set into this beer.
Overall:
Enjoyable, but not for everybody. There seemed to be a significant turn-about in this beer's aging cycle, between the late-90's wineyness, and the Y2K-and-beyond more-traditional ale-like characteristics. In other words, if you prefer your beers dry and ale-like, don't let this beer sit around longer than 3-4 years?..
//TB"
Aroma:
8/10
Appearance:
7/10
Mouthfeel:
7/10
Flavor:
8/10
Overall:
7/10
Final Rating, by Style:
(3.7)
Sampled: Bottle
Value of this beer for its style: Not Sure
[4] Review by E from Spring Mountain, PA, USA who has tried this beer once. (1/15/2005 6:06:11 PM)
"Interesting, the 1987 - 1990 poured an amber color with a very small off white head, while the 94 - 98 were dark brownish red color with a small tan head. The earlier years were more butterscotch and caramel, very sweet aroma. The years from 94 - 98 were more roasty, oak, whiskey, chocolate and spices. Taste was spicy, all years were, dried fruits and light citrus as well. Drinkable, though I'd prefer this at 3 years max."
Aroma:
7/10
Appearance:
7/10
Mouthfeel:
6/10
Flavor:
7/10
Overall:
7/10
Final Rating, by Style:
(3.4)
Value of this beer for its style: Not Sure Compared to this brewer's other beers: Not Sure
Do you want to see the rest of the reviews? Sign In or Register FREE! = BeerPals Only
Review this Beer:
You must be a member to write a review. Please sign up or log in.
(3.3)
